The easing of lockdown has led to a mob rule mentality among some visitors to our countryside, with rural people left picking up the pieces, says Alasdair Mitchell

You’ve seen a poo tree, haven’t you? The poo tree is an increasingly common invasive species, typically found in the 
vicinity of car parks near public green spaces. The chief identifying feature of the poo tree is the plethora of little plastic bags, all tightly knotted, that festoon its lower branches. Each of these strange fruits contains dog excrement. Yes, dog walkers who have gone to the trouble of scooping their pet’s poo into a bag then hang the noisome offering on a branch so that some other poor sod can dispose of it for them.

Or perhaps the poo-hangers honestly think their nasty little offerings will somehow disappear in time due to the actions of the wind and the rain. I really cannot fathom the mindset of these folk. A distraught local in 
Cornwall once told me, as he was on his daily round of poo-bag harvesting: “What really gets me is that these people have the vote.”

As the lockdown eases (or simply doesn’t apply, if thousands of you jostle together holding the right sort of placards and throw bicycles at police horses), the problem grows. And it’s not just farmers and gamekeepers who have noticed the surge in breaches of the Countryside Code.

Rural vandalism littering

There has been a dramatic increase in fly-tipping and littering

Rural vandalism

A Wildlife Trust in Hertfordshire and Middlesex estimated that it had seen a year’s worth of vandalism, trespass and littering on its nature reserves in just two months. A spokesman for a trust in Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire said: “I’ve worked in the sector for nearly 30 years and I’ve never seen anything like this. We have seen a dramatic rise in rural vandalism, fly-tipping, litter, fires, out-of-control dogs worrying our livestock, people feeding and abusing our grazing ponies.”

What on earth is going on? I suspect that we are seeing a sort of mob rule, triggered by urbanites who don’t normally choose to visit rural parts. By contrast, those who customarily walk or cycle in the countryside tend to know the form. A Highland stalker once told me that he seldom had issues with the well-equipped hikers he met on the open hill. The main problems were caused by people who never went more than a short distance from their parked cars.

This same phenomenon is now on display more widely as people who would normally find their exercise in nightclubs, football grounds and town parks have sallied forth into whatever piece of the countryside they can access most readily. Hence, they land on nature reserves, commons and unfenced moorland alongside public roads. Equipped with unruly dogs, portable barbecues and mind-numbing music, they simply have no idea of how to behave.

Rights of access

This puts a new slant on the constant exhortations of those who insist the public need yet more rights of access to the countryside — a place characterised by its relative lack of humans. If you insist on shovelling ever greater numbers of people into sensitive landscapes, then you have to take some responsibility for their impact. Access campaign groups are always harping 
on about their rights, but are not so eager to talk about corresponding responsibilities.

Rural people have largely been bullied into silence about the problems caused by unrestrained public access and rural vandalism. It’s only when nature reserve wardens start to speak out that legislators sit up. Even then, I can guarantee that nothing of any use will be done. The mob rules.