Patrick Hook joins in an experiment to test the ballistic performance of different ammunition
- Every one of us wants to be able to produce nice tight groupings when we shoot.
- However, even if you invest in a top-of-the-line rifle and couple it with the best optics you can find, your money will have been wasted if the ammo you’re using doesn’t suit the gun.
- If the weight of the bullet doesn’t match the twist-rate of the barrel, it will be unstable and accuracy will be non-existent.
The effects of changing ammo
My friend Olly, a keen fox shooter and deer stalker, wanted to know what effects changing a number of features of his ammo would have. These included the type and amount of powder, the bullet’s weight and ballistic characteristics, and the overall cartridge length for both his .308 Sauer 202 and his Nosler M48 in .204.
An interesting exercise for rifle users
The basic set-up was something that anyone with access to a suitable piece of land could achieve — in this case, it was the range on my mate Paul’s farm. The zeroing area is a measured 100 yards and although we normally shoot off a one-ton concrete block, Olly wanted to use a chronograph to measure the bullet velocities.
Using the Chrony Alpha
As this needs to be a few feet from the muzzle, it wouldn’t fit on the short platform we had. To get around this, we set up a wooden table instead. The Chrony Alpha was placed such that the bullet would pass between its antenna-like sensors and the speed displayed on a digital readout.
To minimise the effects of heat on the groupings, Olly fired five times from one rifle, then moved across to the other one before switching back again. After each shot, he checked the velocity, with each value being recorded on his phone. This allowed him to look back over the load configurations and draw sensible conclusions.
The reason for using a different powder was that EU regulations have prohibited the import of any varieties containing certain chemicals. Sadly, this includes many popular ones such as the excellent Hodgdon BL-C(2), which is we have both used until now.
Six types of .22LR rimfire subsonic ammunition from varying manufacturers are tested to ascertain accuracy and stopping power at normal…
What's the best rifle for foxing? How should you choose?
Deer stalking. I have just been on a rifle handling course and the instructor said that I should fire at…
Having spent a lot of time doing his research, Olly concluded that CFE 223, also manufactured by Hodgdon, was a candidate replacement.
Both 32 grain and 39 grain bullets were tested in the .204 — unfortunately, he’d previously discovered that when the rounds were loaded to their optimum performance, they were too long to fit in the magazine. As a result, he’d had to seat the bullet further into the case than he would have liked.
It should be made clear that this was only the first step in Olly’s load development, but it was an important one as it showed that Hodgdon CFE 223 clearly works well, and that further development is worthwhile. Speeds averaged over 3,800 feet per second for the 39 grain bullets, and more than 4,000 feet per second for the 32 grain bullets. I was certainly impressed.