“Countryside is racist” study dismissed by ethnic minority shooters

Ethnic minority fieldsports enthusiasts have spoken out in defence of the countryside, fighting back against a new University of Leicester study that paints a damning picture of racism in rural England.

The university’s Rural Racism Project, designed “to challenge the dominant depictions of rural England as peaceful, neutral and apolitical”, asserts that the countryside is plagued by hostility towards ethnic minorities.

Relying on a combination of interviews and informal conversations, it claims to describe what rural racism looks like, pointing to it being a “predominantly white space” and claiming that other aspects, such as “pub culture”, make people of colour feel like they don’t belong.

Highlighting the research, the Countryside Alliance’s Tim Bonner wrote a scathing review in a Telegraph column, criticising the research for “avoid[ing] anything that might conceivably be described as an objective statistic”.

The study cited 98,799 race hate crimes recorded by police in 2024 but failed to reference the breakdown by police force area, which Mr Bonner claimed show “an almost perfect inverse relationship between rurality and racial incidents”.

Minority shooters criticise the research

More damaging to the Leicester findings are testimonies from  ethnic minority shooting community members, shared with Shooting Times.

Al Gabriel, Nicole Moore and Leon Challis-Davies each described welcoming, inclusive rural and shooting communities that bear no resemblance to the research findings.

BASC Councillor Dr Gabriel said: “Having not personally experienced racism in the countryside, I find the notion that rural communities are inherently racist to be a significant stretch, especially when compared to documented issues in urban centres.”

He was particularly critical of the methodology: “A study based on a handful of informal conversations hardly qualifies as empirical evidence.”

Fieldsports blogger Ms Moore was equally emphatic: “I have never come across racism from anyone in the fieldsports community, and not really in the countryside community either.” She explained that whilst rural curiosity exists, “if I walk into a very rural country pub, of course I get stared at, but I never feel threatened. It’s always that ‘oh, that’s new’.”

Ms Moore also questioned why researchers rather than rural minorities receive funding: “Why aren’t we, those of us who are of colour that live and work in the countryside, offered funding to help get more of our people of colour into the countryside?”

Eat Wild’s culinary director Mr Challis-Davies acknowledged his experience isn’t universal and said he didn’t want to dismiss voices of people who have felt excluded, but said he “hasn’t experienced that kind of hostility described in the report”.

Mr Challis-Davies emphasised the importance of talking openly about perceptions: “If the countryside is seen as unwelcoming by some, then that perception matters. It’s in everyone’s interests to make the rural space accessible whether through shooting, farming or just being outdoors.”

Did you like this article? Read more news from ShootingUK, or subscribe to Shooting Times & Country magazine.