Deer and grey squirrels in policy focus

Shooting delivers the work, but not the credit

At the end of November, the Forestry Commission published a blog titled “A coordinated effort: how we’re tackling the dual threat of deer and grey squirrels”.

It outlines the pressures these species place on the environment. It also highlights government-backed measures to address them. However, it fails to directly recognise those doing most of the work. The shooting community delivers the practical management on the ground.

The blog rightly states that deer and grey squirrels cause serious ecological harm. Browsing prevents woodland regeneration. Bark stripping reduces timber value and tree health. These impacts are well understood. The Forestry Commission then highlights Countryside Stewardship payments. These support deer and grey squirrel control. This support is welcome. However, the reality on the ground tells a different story.

Payments miss the people doing the work

In practice, payments go to landowners. Meanwhile, the work is done by stalkers, keepers and trained volunteers. This is not a small oversight. BASC has raised concerns with Defra’s Environmental Land Management team.

We hear little from keepers or stalkers who benefit directly. Costs such as fuel, time and equipment are rarely covered. If you are a landowner sharing payments fairly, I would genuinely welcome hearing from you.

Positive steps on deer management

The Forestry Commission highlights the Sussex Woods Pilot. This project tests landscape-scale fallow deer management. Its aim is to protect designated sites and support farming and forestry. This is a constructive initiative.

BASC colleagues are actively engaged in its development. The blog also recognises the National Deer Conference. Knowledge sharing between professional and recreational managers is vital. These developments are positive and should be encouraged.

Grey squirrel control needs realism

Grey squirrel control is where the narrative becomes more complex. The Forestry Commission supports the UK Squirrel Accord. This includes funding staff and technical expertise. It also highlights research into immunocontraception as a non-lethal option. This research is promising. BASC supports this work.

However, the evidence is clear. APHA modelling shows contraception works best alongside lethal control. It is most effective after population reductions. It is not a replacement for shooting and trapping. Exceptions may include urban parks.

BASC members are central to delivery

BASC members have made major contributions to this research. Volunteers helped test bait hoppers for safe contraceptive delivery. BASC also trains UKSA volunteers in humane trapping and dispatch. Confidence and welfare standards are essential. These contributions deserve clearer recognition.

The blog concludes with the British Quality Wild Venison Standard. This aims to strengthen the UK venison market. Partners such as Grown in Britain and Approved Game Handling Establishments are referenced. BASC is also a major contributor, although listed only as an “other partner”.

Shooting must be acknowledged

The Forestry Commission concludes by celebrating all contributors. This includes land managers, deer managers and gamekeepers. Shooting underpins this entire effort. It supports woodland health, biodiversity and rural economies. Recognition matters. Not for prestige, but for effective policy. Good policy must reflect how delivery works on the ground.