<strong>Judge condemns cost of hunting prosecution
Would you like to speak to our readers? We offer sponsored articles and advertising to put you in front of our audience. Find out more.The RSPCA has rejected claims that its successful prosecution of a hunt and two of its members for contravening the Hunting Act was politically motivated.
All three defendants in the case — Heythrop Hunt Ltd, huntsman Julian Barnfield and master Richard Sumner — were fined last month after admitting four charges of unlawfully hunting a wild fox with dogs.
However, the fact that Prime Minister David Cameron has ridden with the hunt, and has promised a free vote in the Commons on a repeal of the Act, has led to claims of an ulterior motive behind the prosecution.
After the case at Oxford Magistrates’ Court, Julian Barnfield said: “They could have picked on any other hunt, but they picked on Heythrop because we are in David Cameron’s constituency.”
The rest of this article appears in the 2nd January issue of Shooting Times.
Like this article? Mark this page on a social bookmarking website…
Stay alert to the symptoms of tick-borne infections suck as Lyme disease, warns Charles Smith-Jones
The Prince and Princess of Wales have faced criticism from animal rights group PETA after they had a litter of puppies