Watching a rutting buck out in the field, I saw him respond when I was calling, but lose interest when I stopped. Would it be better to continue calling until an animal turns up?
Would you like to appear on our site? We offer sponsored articles and advertising to put you in front of our readers. Find out more.I have been taught that there should be an interval between making calls such as the fawn squeak. However, watching a rutting buck out in the field, I saw him respond when I was calling, but lose interest when I stopped. Would it be better to continue calling until an animal turns up?
The call-and-wait technique is widely accepted and generally has proved successful. The idea is to start quietly, in case a buck is lying close by, then by degrees call more loudly, varying the tone, but staying still between each session for several minutes. However, I can recall a number of occasions when a buck has lost interest, just as you describe.
A team of Swedish stalkers has recently been filming the roe rut in England, employing a new design of call. They were very successful using continuous, rather than spaced, calling. However, this was early in the rut and the bucks called were mostly young. A cautious buck might be alerted if, as he approached, repeated calling failed to be so convincing at shorter range, or was not accompanied by a waft of a does pheromones, for example. Bucks often circle to get the wind.
It is possible that old stagers might need a more refined technique before they are completely deceived, but there is a lot about calling which remains a mystery.
BASC calls for delay to the Scottish government’s muirburn licensing scheme amid concerns from practitioners over the code’s workability.
Following countryside organisations’ campaigning, penalties for illegal coursing have increased, with average fines up from £360 to £6,000