The latest reactions to withdrawal of the general licences
Would you like to appear on our site? We offer sponsored articles and advertising to put you in front of our readers.
Find out more.
Time Well SpentApril 25, 2019
Farmers, gamekeepers and recreational shooters have reacted with a mixture of anger and confusion to the decision by Natural England to withdraw the general licences for England with just two days notice at the height of the lambing and nesting seasons.
The decision follows a legal challenge by the campaign group Wild Justice, led by TV presenter Chris Packham, who claimed that a technicality meant that the licences were not being issued properly.
The news came as a shock to both farmers and shooters. With many taking to social media to express their dismay with the way Natural England had acted.
I find it incredible and completely unacceptable that the decades old general licence is withdrawn at 36 hours notice and before a new licence is put in place. This is chaotic and incompetent government which serves no one. @BBCr4today https://t.co/gkGt8GUILt
It was not just shooting and farming organisations who were not consulted. Police forces, who will be required to enforce the changed laws were also not told about the changes in advance.
To further add to the confusion Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), Northern Ireland’s Department of Agriculture, the Environment and Rural Affairs and Natural Resources Wales allowed their licences to stand. With SNH pledging that no change would be introduced in Scotland without consultation.
The National Gamekeeper’s Organisation highlighted a lack of clarity in the announcement from Natural England, which failed to say when exactly the licences went out of use and did not explain important details such as the status of call birds in Larsen traps. Details which were later filled in by Natural England’s staff.
Wild Justice surprised
Even Wild Justice conceded that they had not expected the licences to be withdrawn so suddenly and in a series of tweets, blogs and press releases they tried to place the blame for the chaos on Natural England. As criticism of the move spiralled Wild Justice frantically tried to shift the blame for the chaos and insisted they had not asked for this year’s licences to be revoked.
Criticism of BASC and the Countryside Alliance
The shooting organisations were also the target of shooters’ frustrations. BASC and the Countryside Alliance were strongly criticised by members for their failure to see the revocation coming and to head it off. With members pointing out that they have known of Wild Justice’s challenge since February and asking what action they have taken.
Hi @DuncanBASC, can you explain to me what BASC have been doing since Feb to fight this? a tiny anti organisation has beaten every shooting org and succeeded in this revocation of the licence. A complete failure of all the shooting orgs, have let down members and rural community
Garry Doolan of BASC responded to the criticism. In a statement he said “Clearly, like all other rural organisations and anybody with an interest in rural affairs, we were alive to the legal challenge by Wild Justice. Like everybody else, we had a right to expect that the due process of a subsequent consultation would take place and we were ready to officially feed into that. It could not have been foreseen by BASC or anybody else that Natural England would pull the general licences in the way they did without consultation or warning. Natural England’s handling of this has been appalling and has let down the entire rural community. We understand the strength and depth of feeling in this and are representing the shooting and rural community at every turn”
Chris Packham and his fellow Wild Justice directors were the main focus of the anger of farmers and field sports enthusiasts. Pictures of lambs with their eyes pecked out by crows were widely circulated. Arable farmers explained via national media that damage caused by pigeons can cost hundreds of pounds per hectare and gamekeepers highlighted the harm corvids do to ground-nesters.
BBC petitioned to sack Chris Packham
A petition started by pigeon shooter and ferreter Andrew Hayes to have the BBC sack Chris Packham rapidly collected signatures. (Sign it here.)
At the time of writing over 82,000 people had signed the call for Packham to be dismissed in just two days. Andrew told Shooting UK he was “Very happy with momentum it’s gained” He went on to explain “it just shows the power of social media. I made the petition purely out of frustration and never expected it to do anything. I shared it on a few social media groups and was amazed by the reaction it got and by the number of people who felt the same way that I did.”
A phone-in discussion about the decision to revoke the licences on the Jeremy Vine show was dominated by criticism of Wild Justice with calls and emails from farmers and pigeon shooters criticising the campaign group for the harm caused by revoking the licences.
Two dead crows were also hung on the Gate of Chris Packham’s home in rural Hampshire. The move was widely condemned by shooters who described it as “Unacceptable behaviour”. BASC joined in the condemnation and asked Chris Packham to reciprocate by condemning criminals who illegally release pheasants from game farms.
We are probably all guilty of being a bit lazy when it comes to cleaning our firearms, but a little time spent now will pay off, insists Felix Petit
By Time Well Spent
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.