Home / News / Moorland Association welcomes Natural England shift on wildfire

Moorland Association welcomes Natural England shift on wildfire

Natural England now publicly accepts that reducing moorland fuel loads is essential, says the MA, but asks why prescribed burning is still missing

Moorland Association welcomes Natural England shift on wildfire Credit: Jenny Cowan
News Desk
News Desk 12 August 2026

The Moorland Association (MA) has welcomed what it calls a significant shift in Natural England’s public position on wildfire, after the regulator’s regional director Ruth Waters acknowledged in a blog on Monday 10 August that reducing fuel loads is essential to preventing catastrophic moorland fires. The association says policy must now catch up with the words.

What has Natural England accepted?

According to the MA’s analysis, published the same day by chief executive Andrew Gilruth, Natural England now publicly accepts that managing vegetation through grazing, cutting and firebreaks is an essential part of wildfire prevention, a case land managers have pressed throughout a summer of record fire activity.

The association notes one omission: prescribed burning. Cool-season controlled burns remain absent from the regulator’s list of accepted tools, even though, as the MA points out, Natural England’s own management plan for its Thursley nature reserve includes controlled burns.

Where does licensing still block the work?

The MA argues that consents and licensing continue to hold back practical fuel management on the ground, citing a burning licence at Hurst and Chunal in the Peak District that expired unused. The association asks “whether Natural England will apply to land managed by others the same wildfire-management principles it recognises as necessary on its own” reserves, pointing to the fuel-management standards accepted at Humberhead Peatlands.

The exchange follows the MA’s public deadline to Natural England over moorland access closures during extreme fire risk, and a summer in which gamekeepers have repeatedly fought fires alongside professional crews.

What happens next

The MA wants the regulator’s acknowledgment turned into working policy: consents that allow fuel reduction at scale, and parity between what Natural England practises on its own reserves and what it permits elsewhere. Ruth Waters’ blog and the MA’s full response are both online.

Frequently asked questions

What has changed in Natural England’s wildfire position?

Its regional director Ruth Waters publicly acknowledged that reducing moorland fuel loads through grazing, cutting and firebreaks is essential to wildfire prevention, language the Moorland Association reads as a welcome shift.

Why is prescribed burning still contested?

Controlled cool-season burning reduces the fuel that feeds summer wildfires, but it remains omitted from Natural England’s accepted toolkit for others’ land, even though the regulator’s own Thursley reserve plan includes controlled burns.

What is the Moorland Association asking for?

Policy to follow the words: consents and licences that let land managers reduce fuel loads at scale, applied to private moorland on the same principles Natural England recognises on its own reserves.

Related Articles