If you want to improve the consistency and accuracy of your rifle shooting, you need to know how focal plans operate
One aspect of rifle scopes that is frequently misunderstood is the difference between a first and second focal plane scope. In the simplest terms, the difference between the two is where the reticule is positioned within the scope — which affects the image you see at differing magnifications.
First focal plane scopes are hugely useful if you shoot at varying ranges, as the stadia remain in the same place on the target when you change magnification. However, with a second focal plane scope, only the cross-hairs remain in the same position. If you have a fixed-power scope, the image is unaffected by where the reticule is placed.
First focal plane scopes
European scope manufacturers tend to favour first focal plane scopes, which have their reticules sited in the middle of the scope tube — that is, below the elevation turrets. This means that when the magnification changes, the reticule increases in size.
Other than that, the reticule will cover more of your quarry as you increase magnification; this has no real implication if you are shooting at a consistent range. However, if you are shooting at longer ranges, and using extra aim points on the reticule to compensate for trajectory drop, then having a first focal plan scope can make a real difference to your shooting.
The advantage, of course, is that first focal plane scopes always keep the same relationship between
the reticule position and the target position, regardless of zooming between magnifications. This means that on a reticule with stadia lines (as opposed to simple cross- hairs) each line remains in a perfect relationship to the target, thus making it easier to adjust for trajectory over longer ranges.
However, there is a disadvantage to this: with a variable power scope the reticule will increase in size so that on the highest magnification, the reticule may be too thick and completely cover a smaller target such as a rabbit or crow.
Second focal plane scopes
In second focal plane scopes, the reticule is positioned on the eyepiece end of the scope, and remains the same at any magnification. Therefore, only the central cross-hairs remain in the same relationship to the target as the magnification changes. This means you have to memorise or write down the compensation for a bullet’s trajectory for each magnification setting, which is tedious. however, the reticule does not enlarge and cover too much of what you are shooting at.
The practical side
With a first focal plane scope, as long as you know the trajectory of your bullet at varying ranges, you can simply use the stadia on your scope to compensate.
With a second focal plane scope, you will need more information — you need to know the compensation for bullet drop, but if you wish to use the stadia to compensate for the trajectory, you will need to know which stadia to use for which magnification setting. you can, of course, always write this down on a note and attach it to your stock, but in the heat of the moment, it is all too easy to make a mistake. of course, with a fixed-power scope, this isn’t an issue, and all you need is one trajectory chart.
If you are shooting at consistent and fairly average ranges there is less of a problem. however, as ranges increase, the position of your reticule can have a direct impact on whether you hit, miss entirely, or, worst of all, wound an animal. it’s worth remembering that with a rabbit gun (for example, a .22 rimfire) or an air rifle for vermin use, there is much more of a curve to the trajectory of the bullet, so the issue is exaggerated.
As with any rifle shooting, make sure you check your scope, ammunition and rifle, and test shoot it at various ranges and differing powers in order to become competent at any range. this will also mean that you are familiar with the settings on your scope — it only takes a morning shooting at targets to practise the different combinations and settings with your rifle and scope, but it is worth it to achieve consistency and humane shots.
How to compensate for bullet drop when using a rifle scope
With either sort of scope, if a roebuck appeared at 75 yards on a ride and your rifle is zeroed at 100 yards, there is no problem. The difference is truly noticed if, say, a stag was to appear up on the hill at 200 yards and you needed to change your magnification from a 4x woodland power to a 10x power.
I’ll explain: your rifle is zeroed at 100 yards, and you are using a 150-gr bullet in .308. At 200 yards the bullet will be about 3.5in lower than your point of aim. If you are using a first focal plane scope at 4x power and then switch to 10x power for the shot, you can useonestadiabelowthecentralcross-hairs to compensate for the bullet drop. This is because, regardless of power, if you know that the second stadia is spot on for the 200-yard trajectory, you can use this to aim with.
However, if you have a second focal plane scope, calculating this is more complicated — as the magnification is increased, the reticule remains the same size but the relationship between it and the stag changes. Therefore, that same stadia down for a 200-yard zero changes as the magnification increases.
On a lower magnification, the second stadia in a second focal plane scope will always be below your target, so the bullet would also hit low on the target, and as you increase the magnification, the stadia to target centre decreases in size. This means that the stadia that works for your 200-yard zero is now way out as a guide for compensating for bullet drop.